/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #8428244

129KiB, 314x278, questionmarkanimegirl.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 22:49:11 2016 No.8428244 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>8428280 >>8428385 >>8428387

Once computers get fast enough, can't we just have all problems solved through guess and check instead of needing math anymore? Will math eventually become a historical relic like the I Ching or bodybuilding?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1476719130299.jpg, 38KiB, 362x346

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 22:50:21 No.8428250 Report

Quoted By: >>8428280

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 22:54:48 No.8428262 Report

Quoted By: >>8428281

Chaitin constant

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 23:02:07 No.8428280 Report

Quoted By:

>>8428244
>>8428250
:D ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 23:02:25 No.8428281 Report

Quoted By: >>8428286

>>8428262

I already solved the halting problem senpai. You can use this function free of charge, just make sure to credit me in your program's readme file:

if (won't halt)
{
print("no");
}
else
{
print("yes");
}

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 23:04:14 No.8428286 Report

Quoted By: >>8428305 >>8428676

>>8428281
Of the original seven Millennium Prize Problems set by the Clay Mathematics Institute, six have yet to be solved, as of 2016:
P versus NP
Hodge conjecture
Riemann hypothesis
Yang–Mills existence and mass gap
Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness
Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 23:10:45 No.8428305 Report

Quoted By: >>8428348

>>8428286

>P versus NP
P is NP, solved.
>Hodge conjecture
Hodge is wrong, solved.
>Riemann hypothesis
Riemann's right, solved.
>Yang–Mills existence and mass gap
It exists, solved.
>Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness
Doesn't exist, solved.
>Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture
They're right, solved.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 4db.png, 72KiB, 680x514

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 23:31:08 No.8428348 Report

Quoted By:

>>8428305

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 23:46:03 No.8428385 Report

Quoted By:

>>8428244
Aren't computers already at this point?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Oct 2016 23:47:55 No.8428387 Report

Quoted By:

>>8428244
Yep. Why continue to use a generalize machine when you can build a more efficient specialized one that's actually good at the task natively.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Oct 2016 01:17:46 No.8428559 Report

Quoted By: >>8428660 >>8428697

OP, you're right but no one wants to admit it. We're getting closer and closer to that point but it's not yet there.

Quantum computers at this point is just guess and check machines. Get ready for mathematics enthusiasts to start using the term "Monte Carlo Method"

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1477004241204.jpg, 14KiB, 369x226

Anonymous Sat 22 Oct 2016 02:01:57 No.8428660 Report

Quoted By:

>>8428559
monte carlo method isn't just guessing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Oct 2016 02:11:24 No.8428676 Report

Quoted By:

>>8428286
>Riemann hypothesis
Wasn't it proven that it was independent of ZFC?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Oct 2016 02:26:20 No.8428697 Report

Quoted By:

>>8428559
>Quantum computers at this point is just guess and check machines. Get ready for mathematics enthusiasts to start using the term "Monte Carlo Method"
Given the vast number of subjects you appear to be clueless about, it might be best if you just stop posting.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches