>>14096093Computer that is limited to calculate 10 moves into the future wins grandmaster.
>>14096120>Even a 1900 ELO chump can do this and not only for forcing sequences.Competely wrong. Even grandmasters make blunders which were preventable by 2-3 move sequences. Some examples of 2 move sequences grandmasters regularly miss:
>Moving two pieces so that they get forked by knight of pinned by bishop the next move>Moving the bishop (or failure to move the bishop) so that it gets trapped by pawns the next move>Castling long that immediately reveals king to a check that leads to pawn capture >What the 1900 ELO lacks is positional/strategic judgment.Meaning? Chess has no clear mathematical structure, only thing that matters is how long to the future you can calculate the moves. There exists almost zero strategical comments about chess, e.g. "Never trade rook for pawn" or "in the opening develop your pieces" or "connect your rooks in the endgame", except for those that immediately cause a checkmate.
>>14096212Yeah going to jail is pretty enormous failure. Havent done that yet. Dont speak to me further criminal.
>>14099105Poker is perfect information game, what the fuck are you talking about. The exact cards that the opponents are holding are nearly meaningless to your strategy. The cards that will be dealt as the community cards have literally zero impact on your strategy.
Like, you LITERALLY know what cards your opponent is holding. Its an element of the 169 element set {AA, AKs, AK, KK,...}.
>>14099721Computer that could calculate N+1 moves into the future always wins against computer that calculates N moves into the future.
>>14100785This is too generic argument. People should consider the actions of other people. E.g.
Me: Raping your girlfriend
Op: For some reason upset about it, because he wants his own genes to spread instead of mine
or
People: Enjoy playing chess for 3 hours
Me: Upset, because I could do something more fun with those people
