>>13226473>>13226566>Instead, fundamental laws describe highly idealized objects in models.The fuck? You have to have a high school mentality to think that scientists think otherwise. This is essential *the* definition of science in the first place: model building to try to predict reality.
Hell, it's practically acknowledged by naming conventions in science. "Newton's law of gravitation" is just an effective model which applies to large objects at relatively low speeds. It is not an accurate model of reality beyond its domain of applicability, and everyone knows this. That's why Einstein gravity is a thing. And we know that Einstein gravity fails at certain regimes too, which is why so much effort has gone into researching quantum gravity. This is not fucking news to anybody.
How is this novel or groundbreaking? Is this what modern "philosophy' looks like?
