>>11391616>Trick testsCorrect, but the first conclusion we should draw for that isn't "bioweapon".
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-51491763Tests check the upper respiratory system, when the disease starts out in the lower respiratory system. It's why China started diagnosing people with CT-scans and X-rays, which allows you to check the lower respiratory system.
>Incubates for a monthDubious. There has been one instance of which the Chinese claimed it had a 28 day incubation period. Claimed. It's entirely possible that the Chinese faultily tested. It's why no health organization takes one case as being representative. More information/research is needed but... y'know... China. Even then, the grand majority of cases have incubation periods of up to 5 days.
>Tries to kill you with pneumoniaYes, just like the flu in very severe cases.
>You can get reinfected>If you do get reinfected you can get a heart attackLook at the full message Taiwannews reported
>“It’s highly possible to get infected a second time. A few people recovered from the first time by their own immune system, but the meds they use are damaging their heart tissue, and when they get it the second time, the antibody doesn’t help but makes it worse, and they die a sudden death from heart failure.”The problem appears to be the medicine used rather than the virus itself per se. But this is another case where more data and research is necessary, rather than the word of one doctor.
>If you survive that somehow it can go for your reproductive organsIDK, I guess. It's not "somehow" though, it's associated with the same way it damages the kidneys.
>And there are people still in denial that this is some type of bio-weapon?Yes. Nothing you said implies a bioweapon. Explain how your premises lead to the conclusion "bioweapon".
>>11407868>Eric Ding>Actually professionalThe man who never saw an R0 of 3.8 in his entire career?
