>>11393787>>11393817>>11393985(cont)
At the PhD everyone can do each other's work given the time, but nothing is readily given to you based on the title of PhD alone, which already indicates that this idea of the "best" route for anyone interested in math and science is sort of a bullshit claim
>Engineering degrees are incredibly employable what are you talking about?read again what I said about oversaturation
>Physics and math degrees have a way higher unemployment rate then engineersat undergrad, sure, and I'm not contesting this
>Fuck off with this retarded meme. I shouldn't have to take a double major just to be employable with a math degree.Not really, it's that in getting a true CS degree, you end up going through a math major with the concentration in CS of your choice, which at many schools translates to a double major. In any other program, it's like a big overloaded single program,
>no major guarantees a job, some majors just have a higher chance of getting a job then others.then stop pedaling engineering as being the answer to employment. The reality is that engineering IS insanely oversaturated and we don't have the same demand for jobs as we did in the 90s.
>Employability will always be a huge merit to majorsyou missed my point - this is the math and science board that discusses math and science, primarily its pursuit and its research. Employability is an artifact of conversation due to the fact that this board is filled with 20 somethings who want a career, but in and of itself has no place on the math and science board.
Like dude, we get it you did engineering but it's not special. Doing 'more math and science that most' doesn't mean much when it's surface level or heavily removed from its original contexts. Engineering itself is fine, but it's not the hail mary of employability nor of those who want careers in math and science
