>>11068243And for that reason, I have not responded to any scholarly comment with death threats. If it is your opinion that obvious fallacies are scholarly, and that unsupported claims are scholarly, and that mockery is scholarly.
Fallacy isn't based on opinions. The truth is the truth, and fallacy is fallacy.
You fucking retards are so fucking stupid you make want to kill even more people than I already did with your, "Shouting down all opposition," memes. Every comment in this thread even remotely related to RH is completely fucking retarded, and it is so fucking retarded that is neither civil nor scholarly.
And now you with your, "He can't stand to be wrong," lies are shitting the thread up even more. I love it when people prove me wrong. The reason I am pretty much always right about everything today is because of all the people who kind enough to prove me wrong yesterday, thus affording me the opportunity to unfuck myself. Do you not understand that I make these threads specifically to reap scholarly criticisms? Are you so fucking retarded that you can conflate these mockers' words with earnest criticism?
You are so fucking stupid with your, "He can't stand opposition," memes. You try to frame it like because I want to kill everyone who mocks me, it means I want to kill everyone who disagrees with me, and that does not follow at all, and it is such a blatantly obvious fallacy that your comment is neither civil nor scholarly, and you should be killed for it.
