>>10780313>The mainstream media focuses on the alarmists. you mean, the consensus of 98+% of actual scientists? with that <2% accounted for by "scientists" employed by oil interests? let me guess, academia and the media are in a giant conspiracy, right? probably tesla was right and the ether is real and nuclear doesn't real, okay
>Why did the media focus on Greta Thunberg so much? because she's a little girl. little girls are cute and get media attention. oh, and she's white. little white girls make the news all the time, especially if they get kidnapped or killed. making a speech at the UN is super cute. clickbait must-watch TV and great photo ops.
>Her speech to the UN broadcast for the world to see. School kids have been encouraged to skip school and protest, they're paraded around the media like they're martyrs. Do you not see an agenda here?whose agenda, pray tell? the evil solar energy lobby, with all their bazillions of dollars keeping the coal and oil industry down? or maybe the agenda of the reptilians who control israel? details, please.
>No such attention is given to "skeptics", this is not about the science, it never was.the skeptics are mostly youtube retards and bought-out political shills like mike pompeo. they don't deserve media attention, because what they say has no authority or credibility. you could pick out maybe a few "contrarians" like Bob Laughlin, but even nobel laureates in physics can be crazy too, like Brian Josephson. just because you have a handful of naysayers doesn't mean that telekinesis is real. same goes for climate denial
