>>10719970>Sleep MedicineNow this is a prick of a field to be in in a diagnosis point if given non typical or symptoms that aren't persistent. Sure the work hours aren't bad if you're the sitter.
But the problems with patients not getting results to their problem because they fluked normal sleep for 5 days must be both irritating. And saddening in some cases.
Then on top of that. Dealing with the few that expect results to say near brain death events. Even tho they're just shitty sleepers or stressed.
A lot of time invested for seemingly low pay offs.
Does their field have application else where? I'd think the lucky bastards in research doing experiments to visualize dreams and such would have some really crack pot approaches and theory's.
I'd given some thought to dream's purpose in past and concluded it's a semi-byproduct of randomized data analysis for creating obscure/lateral connections. Using visual input as a way to broaden detection as perspective may be hard in a raw data format without proper binocular calibration. Or for emotional response to be created initiating pathway variances because of elector-chemical unpredictability and travel of substance and their reactive predictability of fluids released in a closed system of complex fluid composition.
Typically it's of data collected during the day that's the main focus. As expressed by dream journalists.
But I dare say if a 'research path' is found warranting dropping need for randomized data calls and analysis. I'd guess that a recurring dream sequence may initiate as to not disrupt expected sleep pattern when processing power was reduced to a more linear task, Basically a screensaver mode.
But I'm bored as fuck and applying computer science to biological elements. That I don't even think run on impulse alone anyways. Birds can react to 600+fps projectiles. And I can seemingly always blink just right whist grinding. There's got to be more data bandwidth than suspected.
