>>10635382Maybe, but I think not.
The reason being that despite us all belonging to the same species and having comparable features (i.e, all humans have dreams), there are probably neurological variations between individuals that are too diverse to create a standard "dreamreading" technology that would work on every brain.
Neurologically speaking, a dream is a very high level concept, but maybe you could achieve it by combining systems that accomplish simpler functions in the brain.
With this idea we mostly focus on the visual part of it, "viewing" dreams like movies, but maybe we'd realize there is a lot of noise and other sources of data that we don't give thought to when we wake up and think about the dream we've had, but that we'd need nonetheless to restore the dream in a consumable format.
