>>10407916it's actually a very real issue if you look at the wiki discussions.
and for clarification you can think of "astromancy" as "practicing astrology",because for someone to practice something, he needs to consider it a thing to be (systematically) learnable, which very much like saying it's a science.
the argument that "divination" is not "magic" is where I'm stuck ,but I would say that the term "magic" needs to be reduced to "illusion" because in reality there is no "magic" that isn't a illusion. that means there is no "supernatural" and "divination" clearly has a supernatural aspect to it... and I think not even a believer would deny that. which would make my point.
chekm8
