>>11552649It's not,
You'd have to remove perpetual property for a start or enforce some silly anti-monopoly measure, else everything will slowly belong to the (eventually immortal) person who own all the robots and automated factories.
Alternatively, you could consider it "free" because the one who own everything may not care to keep everyone else alive, thus everything is free for him.
"Capitalism" is a Paperclip Maximizer scenario centered around the wealth of a single entity. Unless every humans being are made part of that entity, it doesn't have to care about you.
States and Democracy were created to be that system you belong to and "have" to care about you, but they are becoming nothing but the private police of Multinational corporations.
Consider the following:
If you had intelligent robot catering to all of your needs and didn't even need other human to satisfy you intellectually anymore. Only a (hypothetical) remnant of social instinct or laws, "forcing you to pay to feed parasite" as ancap would say, might have you care/give/sell stuff for other being.
>the same information you agree to sell to get access to Facebook>you agree toThat's a good joke anon,
We both know they'd take the information wether or not you know/agree about it and that information is only used for your own good if it happen to make a profit for shareholders. Else it will be used against you and to keep you from doing anything about that.
I can't wait for the new Apple product iMindcontrol chip that everyone will buy because "it's Apple" and which PASSIVELY make Apple product look better and come with a ToS that allow them to disconnect your brain if you damage Intellectual Property.
so basically
>>11534375 video
