>>6016709Your values are inconsistent. Like the light source is all over hte place. Compounded by the odd use of halo effect throughout. Interior of the flowers should be dark, yet the halo makes it all disjointed and throws off the light sources. You would need to have much deeper values and darker darks to compensate for the overuse of halos. Under the flowers/leaves hanging over the pot, it should be much darker, yet very few stipples. Just a generic more to less to put a highlight in the center part of the vase/pot when the values should be more for hanging shadows. Liek the leaf gets a halo and tiny little dots even though it should have a cast shadow. The various things that overlap never really produce cast shadows or not represented by the stippling. The only time it really looks right is the big flower over the pot casting a shadow on the leaf to the left of it. Virtually nothing else in the image has a cast shadow despite everything overlapping. The pot has a weird value around it. It's a 3d object that exists ont he table, but the darker stippling extends to the far edge of the table along the halo you have on the pot. This implies the entire table is covered by the vase and messes with the perspective. THe vase is on the very edge of the table as well. It is perfectly flat looking with very slight angle perspective. THe table, in contrast, is extreme angle. We'd assume a couple feet across but very slight angle. The vase should have an extreme angle for the eliptical bottom. The flowers in turn should all angle towards us. The table should probably be more flat if we base the persepctive on the larger focal object of the plants with less of the table surface visible.
Values is the biggest issue though. No cast shadows really present and the inconsistent use of halos.
