>>5810459Not necessarily. Some abstract art still obey composition rules drawn from Nature, and as a result, still present a certain degree of aesthetics/technicality.
But overall, you're right, it's quite limited, and is often used for "unholy" purposes (e.g. tax evasion schemes).
Abstraction and meaninglessness aren't the same things. Numbers in essence are abstract, yet they have plenty of useful practical applications. Also, abstraction isn't chaos: there is order in abstraction, and that's a major parts of maths, which is the backbone of all sciences but human sciences (mostly).
>See politicians like Obama, Merkel, Macron...There aren't: you're likely expecting them to behave in the interest of the people and to be honest, and are being disappointing. But they actually do what they aim at, which is serving their own interests and the interests of their associates (basically). Eventually serving the interests of the people, if it aligns with their primary objectives.
Merry Christmas
