>>4469645From what I've noticed, the America's and its artistic furry ties are predominately influenced by Disney to an insane degree (arguably, in an unhealthy manner) from what I've seen over the years from their artistic communities.
But strangely enough though, a lot of Yuros ( even those who may or may not be anglo centric) seem to be able to shakeoff such an influence somehow when it comes to furry styles. There's a weird nuance going on whenever I see furry art that comes from there. You might see /trash quality showing up here and there in places if you're unlucky enough, but there is still a thing going on with a lot of them where they somehow have an identity of their own that don't rely on Disney as their crutch.
Stuff like
>>4469501 is european, and while it might still look a bit lewd, im not really reminded of Disney when looking at it.
Makes me wonder if there are furry influences in Europe that date before Disney? Maybe they simply just liked animals and thought it would be cool to anthropomorphize them? I know people like to say the US started it with cons and shit, but I wonder if aristocrats engaged in that kind of thing first before they did?
