>>4369173>Some feel humans should rise above these needs I guess?
Sure, that's understandable and perhaps even admirable but attacking pornfag artists because they receive "undeserved" (lol) attention is completely misguided and in my mind betrays the critic's vulgar, low-class obsession with external validation, and that's why I call these people immature shitheads. Again, the current situation is a result of the human condition and a lack of checks on the Internet as it works today. If somebody wants to change this situation he shouldn't be crying on a red 4chan board.
My replies in this thread are a critique of the typical anti-pornfag as I interpret it. I find most of them to be at least as vile and lowly as the people they criticize. Look at >>4368517
and all his earlier replies for example, what a snake and cowardly fucking idiot. No wonder /ic/ is so shitty these days.>You obviously don't agree
Why do you think that I don't agree? Have I implied that the prevalence of porn on the Internet is good for people? When I say "should" I'm merely drawing a conclusion, I'm not saying that it's the ideal order of things.>you can see where a natural tension would arise then?
Yes but what I'm complaining about is the chosen outlet. To the rest of us these people are just disruptive newfag hypocrite puritan cancer. >I could certainly see a mindset were the aggravation comes from not wanting stupid people to be stupid.
I don't see this mindset. I see jealousy. These people are fuming because the likes aren't distributed as they see fit. Sincere people on a journey to reach SKILL wouldn't be preoccupied with these thoughts. How can they have the gall to complain about their natural superiors?