>>4000648>>4000652You're generalizing. When something is one-note or one-dimensional that's bad, but that's an issue of bad writing rather than loli. It's also not what the poster I responded to was talking about. They complained about it being too light-hearted to relate to.
Take pic related for example. It is that very fluffy stylization you talk about, in a lighthearted SoL comedy harem series. Utterly flagrant hedonistic indulgence. Now consider the context of the person who, when making a comic about this indulgent paradise, drew this scene of being held by a cute little girl with a big smile, being told they've done a good job. Is the point of this "cuteness turned up to 11", is it made by a "spoiled and naive person"? Or is it the author writing about unfulfilled desire for their efforts to be rewarded with acceptance and affection by a superior being? The same type of acceptance that serves as one of the core principles of Christianity, for example.
The first person is naive, but you're just a simpleton.
