>>2846497Your point is that you're doing mental gymnastics to try in be right when you don't have a base to begin with.
First you're saying she's using the definition of queer as a means to deviate from the norm.
But then when told this girl is not doing anything that deviates from the norm simply because she LOOKS different, you suddenly bring up trans people, who weren't relevant in the fucking slightest because the girl is not trans.
And then to refute that point, I bring up that it's not about the amount of people but it's social acceptance. In America, being trans is CONSIDERED normal, or at least, that is the point of traditional "Land of the Free" American values (Not Conservative Christian values). By making that point and pushing it to the extreme to show you that blacks are a low number, but are NOT considered deviants because of low population alone to show you that number is not relevant to the trans community, I further push it to show you what an actual deviation from social norm is, which would be satanists.
Considering you completely failed to understand either use of me mocking your way of defining things by queer, and clearly missing me saying how fucking stupid it would be to call blacks or satanists queer, even though it would be "accurate", you then just fall back on, "Yeah, but I meant Tumblr girls with neon colored hair". Which means your trans argument came out of fucking nowhere and you were just trying to twist the original intent of the discussion so you could win a point that eventually boiled down to you agreeing with me in that this girl is a walking stereotype who identifies her as the incorrect thing. Because Tumblr girls with neon hair are in no way queer.
Basically you're illiterate and retarded but are probably too far deep in this rabbit hole to admit it and think if you shitpost enough, you'll feel better about the fact that you've spent hours discussing nothing.
