>>5124919Nope, it’s not BS, women have practically no sexual response to attractive mates in comparison. The “women are the same, but mental” anon above me is just cope/rationalization - read between the lines, if what turns women on is “the situation,” then they aren’t being physically turned on by the person they’re with. It’s why you see those charts comparing how men rate women (right-shifted bell curve) to how women rate men (“meh” until the dude is basically a 10/10). This is both good and bad for dudes - you don’t need to be hot to attract women, but it sure as shit makes it nigh impossible to stand out in any way at a glance. If you’re a 6-8/10, you can’t really bank on that being much better than being a 4/10. Terrible for a culture where people meet by glancing at a picture and “swiping.”
I’m not saying the female level of physical attraction is zero, but it’s like comparing Prang watercolours to Daniel Smith. If you haven’t FELT the difference, you’re only guessing at what you can observe from the outside, but blackpill spoiler: the difference is massive.
t. FtM
