>>99043687Reminds me of a story I read, about a black guy at some school, who got drunk at some party, fell asleep and his mates got a photo of his dick, which was apparently less than average. The next day they drew a 1" cock in the blackboard. Tough shit, really.
>>99043766>size queens ain't worth your time anywayThis. Studies have shown that most women, even for one night stands,like cocks in the 6" range. If there's a woman out there who demans an 8"+ cock, literally in the 0.000001% of male population, then she's not worth anybody's time.
>>99043746>I'm still a virgin thoughDon't worry mate, 6" 9I assume bonepressed,asthat's how doctors measure it), if you have some decent girth, is Goldilocks tier. And every non-virgin will tell you, moves play a far bigger role than size. The way you move, the way you touch her, kiss her, all that jazz. Women aren't men who get off from sucking on their trunk, they're different organisms. About 90% of women don't even orgasm from penetration alone.
>inb4 dickletPeople like you are the reason why so many men are betas nowadays. They lack spine because you keep drilling into their heads that if they aren't Adonis crossed with Newton they're doomed to die alone. Get off your basement, meet some actual women, and you'll see they're not shallow cumsluts.
Are there certain thots out there who are puddle-deep size queens who don't care about anything else? Sure. But why would you care? They're not worth your time, just like some cheating ass who treats women like objects isn't worth their time. The two genders have their differences but in the end the vast majority is just people trying to make things work and be good.
