>>98774912I wanna believe, but I can't. It looks decent, but there's still all these little pockets of deceit I get. It's not going to do well, but it'll be better in sales because it looks like a return to form but will ACTUALLY fool a good chunk of /co/. FUck, I think more people will even defend it because they see the characters they wanted back, yet they'll be written like total trash still with terrible art, and frequent moments of bullshittery.
There is not a chance in Hell that I'm going to immediately trust them. Maybe if I see some things for myself in a year or so from now that really show improvement and that it's NOT a new paint job over the shit heap which is current Marvel, then maybe I'll give them my money again.
But c'mon, there's still shit writers, still shit artist, and still an agenda. I know a lot of the shittier books got canceled, but we need a change of the internal structure of the universe itself. It's not satisfying anymore -- the changes that have been made to characters like trying to make Jen Walters a new incarnation of the Hulk (when she was a fine enough character from before).
I smell a good idea for how to execute their branding, except the landscape of Marvel as of now is in no shape to be branded at all. It's still trash, they will still be forcibly changed characters there under bad writing, and they don't want to change it. They want it to LOOK changed, and a lot of people on this thread seemed a bit more open-minded and fooled by this.
My word of advice, be a smart consumer: read your shit for free and if things are good by the middle of the year, THEN you should start buying.
This isn't a huge scam like Marvel Legacy, but that's why it's more dangerous: it's being handled well enough to fool us more than before. The thread is too optimistic already.
>inb4 I'm called either a racist, a fan of D&C, or a shill 
