>>98142607>forgot spoilersFugg.
>>98142671You've gotta step outside of yourself and your viewpoint as a consumer of said hypothetical porn, and into the thought process of the corporate. What would a major company like Illumination have to gain from producing animated pornography? The market's already saturated with mostly free-to-view animations made by independent artists, the backlash from their customer base would heavily affect long-term profit margins, and there's MUCH more to be made for less effort churning out lowest-common-denominator blasè bullshit for foreign audiences. Even IF the thought occured to one of these normie-ass execs or board members, it would be economic and PR suicide.
>>98142763It's unfortunate that I've only just gotten into 3D porn, otherwise I'd be able to recommend you some good shit. I've got nothing in particular at the moment. But there ARE good artists out there-- just few and far between.
