>>97929409My point was saying "OMG I'M SO ANGRY CAN'T BE-LIEVE THEY PUBLISHED THIS" is silly when they've published worse for 80 years.
>>97929434Well no shit it's not good, I'm not arguing otherwise. There's problems here I several areas, and of course it looks bad next to A+ talent like Tradd.
I'm saying that this is standard levels of ineptitude. You're only keying in on the common problems (off model, halfassed or cheating appendages, mediocre composition, repeating shit to save time) because it's a simpler style instead of the Jim Lee school of egregious crosshatching. It's the same lazy angles and shortcuts, just without a realistic jawline and pointless zigzag lines on the cheeks.
