>>97781624To your first point, Unicron's pain attacks would stop him in his tracks, that was show every time. Galvatron and what he wants is pointless. We saw no evidence Galvatron could do anything other than lurch in pain. Unicron forgets this and lets Galvatron walk right up to him with what can kill him.
>You do understand what Hubris is, right?You are assuming it's hubris, like I said, you are filling in holes that writers never gave answers to.
>I'm not shifting anything and giving you details that you're ignoring.yes you have, look at your first answer, you keep humming on Galavtron and what he did when the plothole is what Unicrion didn't do.
>I explained how it made sense to meThat doesn't mean it makes sense to the narrative.
>and most people who watched the thingNow you speak for all? You are showing how much a corner you are in trying to claim it's "most people"
>I honestly don't see how it's so complicated It's not, they made a plothole, gave no means to fill it or explain it. Consider that when Galvatron thought he destroyed the matrix Unicron tortured him because he saw it wasn't destroyed, but when Galvatron had it? When he claimed he was going to make Unicron his slave? Unicron just yells. No torturer, no demand to destroy it, he just let's him come back and threaten him. It's a major hole in the story telling.
>You're literally the first person I've seen make this complaint that it's a plothole.You need to lurk more then, this has been brought up before both here and on TF fan forums. The debates are always the same but the demand a lot of assumptions not given in the film.
> you're acting more like you can't accept my opinion Not sure how that relates to my point about you, anyway, I'm debating it and trying to get you to understand that all you bring is a fan theory. It stands as a plothole because you must add to it rather than be able to show a source proving it from the film.
