>>97574885His love for her was shown in a good light because it was his perspective. The film wanted to make you feel what K feels. Her death is in the greater scheme of things, the least important yet in the movie it is treated as the most important because of K's emotional attachment to her.
>>97574841gets it.
>>liking doki doki, a dating sim made by a man buttmad over sexualizing 2D women>Opinion discardedBuddy, I should but I won't discard yours.
From what I got out of it, Doki Doki is more about the cerebral aspect of dating sims than the sexualization. You're dumbing shit down if you take the "liberals don't like muh anime because feminism" trope, which is how you are coming off.
Dating sims are and have always been creepy. Doki Doki just highlights that and exactly why. It targets gameplay (think all of the horror moments where you cannot go forward or evade the scary shit, only go forward. You have no control) and the cerebral (Why would you want a girl who's only purpose is to fall in love with you for no reason except that you play the game? There's no connection. There's nothing in common except the game expects you are an introverted nerd who likes anime and video games) .
It never targets sexualization or even puts a feminist slant on any of it. There's even opportunities for that with Yuri's boobs, Monika's kneesocks, but no, it never touches upon any of that as the reason for its targeting of dating sims. It targets dating sims because well.. they are kind of fucked up.
