>>97543277>taking a story that originally stared white men / or a activity that was historically speaking dominated too almost 100% by men and replace themIts fiction and has been retold in different ways so many times, why is this the line?
>a story that focuses around physical combat and have it star normal woman and expecting us to believe that she could hold her own>2. anything that doesn´t invovle physical combat. they can be magicians, scientists, politcla leaders, doctors ... etc.How do you know she is physically a normal human?
Space ships, space jelly fish, sea dragons, gorilla men, talking birds, blue skinned people - that's all fine.
But a fighting woman, that's not?
Seems like a bit of an over reaction anon.
And how are these changes defined as "SJW", maybe they're bad or clichéd, by why do you see it as "SJW"?
And how about older works of fiction that had women engaged in physical tasks, are they also "SJW"?
And what if its what the author wants to do, they cannot freely explore their creative ideas, bad or clichéd though they might be, because you have declared it is "SJW"?
