>>96322801>When some virgin is sat masturbating to some female ideal, they're much less likely to want an ordinary looking woman.
And when he gets rejected because he's not handsome enough, or tall enough, or makes enough money, or doesn't have nice clothes or whatever the female sex decides isn't up to their standards, he should just accept it, or change himself to meet the wants of women. But women don't have to do that for him, because muh empowerment.
And on top of all that, you took away fapping from him too.
You can say male sexuality is toxic, and you may even be right, but just as equally toxic is the notion that women can do no wrong and everything men can do is wrong. The reason why feminists shit on sexbots is because they know once a reasonable human facsimile is out there and can meet the sexual needs of men, and can self clean, is that's when women are done. The women's movement is over because men don't actually like dealing with women and their bullshit. Sexbots will be the true equalizer of the sexes, the one women are actually begging for, because when human females aren't looked at as sex objects anymore (there are literal sex robots to replace them) and have to get by on merit alone, everyone is going to realize that by and large, women suck at doing the same tasks that men can do. Men make better friendships with other men, and women in the office place can be competent but very rarely do they actually excel. Apart from pro-creation, what do we "need" women for? They'll just be looked at as fellow humans, but who aren't as efficient as their XY counterparts.
The monopoly on the vagina will soon be over. If the sexbots can be made to cook and clean as well, then human women will pretty much be driven to slavery to compete with them. Well, at least until the sexbots become universally affordable.