>>96175621>because your original statement was outlandish.No, it wasn't. My original statement was
>something as private as touching as dying if you ever get a kid, of course you are not going to confide that kind of thing to your partner up until things get serious.On the other hand, that anon stated
>That'd just make Surma even more awful than she is already. That's like hiding an STD, but 100 times worse.Who is outlandish and cause that reaction. And then the goalpost actually was moved by this anon, there, not me, by saying
>>>96175265>>it doesn't affect you when your wife and the mother of your child diesChanging the setting from "teenager girlfriend" to "wife and mother of your child" (and by the way, Surma actually told that to tony before they got their kid, meanign she actually did what you considered the thing to do instead of not doing it and calling her worst than an STD transmitter).
>It would absolutely not be justifiable to hide this.It is perfectly justifiable to be privy about this when it come to a relationship that hasn't developped into having kids/marrying yet. It's the equivalent of not telling you have cancer on your first dates.
>Put it off because it's difficult? Sure, that's cowardly, but understandable.MY POINT, FROM THE VERY START. Except I wouldn't call it cowardly. It's human, it's only worng to not tell if you are actually trying to conceive and your partner don't know it will kill you.
>But there'd still have to be a resolution in her mind to tell him.It's something to tell to the person you intend to have a kid with. there is no obligation before that and there is nothing sociopathic about not telling before reaching that point.
