>>95580813Because nothing about Hitler was fresh or interesting or meritorious, not these quotes, not him, not his ideology. Hitler is a black hole out of which no value escapes. When people say "but he loved animals" they forget that there is a world full of other people, who also love animals, who are not Hitler.
The quotes are garbage and that you fail to see that means you are a brainlet, a trait you share with Hitler. They were garbage when they were written and they are garbage now. They are the insipid musings of a brainlet who has thought about politics for thirty minutes and decided that was enough to judge the whole field bullshit and a waste of time and then proceed down the path of being more concerned with being strong than being right. Let the record show that strength without righteousness is far more of a disaster than righteousness without strength.
Your four much-loved, gently-used quotes are just part of the library of evidence that shows Hitler's dismissive attitude towards political philosophy. Someone who actually concerned themselves with intelligent insights into politics would have come up with something more interesting to say than the, yes, equally trite statement "children are the future," (which is really just what I said rephrased, and nothing so different as you want to represent it as). So yes, I have complete confidence in saying that those four quotes could disappear from the entire world, remembered by nobody, and we would not lose a single fucking iota of complexity re: political thought. Far from being dismissed because Hitler('s translator) wrote them, those quotes are ONLY REMEMBERED because of retards like you who think that the edgy contrarian position of "well he wasn't ALL bad" will get you pussy and rely on the half-assed brainfarts of a mass-murdering drug-user to support this claim. You repeat them and repeat them until they are burned into our brains.
Pic related - an actually good quote.
