>>95089750>The current Batwoman and the Batwoman from the 60's are not the same Batwoman.it's new 52 comics. So I don't see what your point of this is. Characters are written by people and they were all written to be gay purposely. I don't understand why you would use that as an excuse? Again look at the whole board, not just your next chess move.
>Bisexual. Like this is somehow shockingstill in the LGBT realm so still gay
>Blatantly obvious bisexual. Which is fine, since she's batshit crazy.the fact we have to bullet point multiple characters at once instead of discussing them as individuals kinda proves my point over yours
>Sexual in general. Her entire selling point is "Plant lady seductress". Man, woman, small child. She doesn't care as long as it furthers her goals.She may as well be a Chlorosexual.
so you mean pansexual? again part of the LGBT therefore she's gay.
In terms of your last comment. That's not true. I think women are more drawn to aesthetics and I think they are just naturally closer. They are not gayer, just more affectionate.
And the reason women were willing to do that carpet munching was because men liked it. Men in sparta used to bang young boys. Its all about what society deems ok.
And I am not ok with characters I supported being taken and given to butch dykes when butch dykes dont even like comics
