>>94185843>animated BBTOh please, like that show has the balls to reference weed, or the slightest knowledge of millenial humor. BBT isn't a terrible show because it's a show about smart people doing nerdy things.
It's a terrible show because
>all characters have little pathos at the start, even less as you go along>characters become genuinely unlikeable, and they're still represented as sympathetic e.g. Sheldon, Raj, Leonard's mother>The constant awkward delivery of lines>Jokes are mildly amusing at best, genuinely painful at worst, but for the most part just fall flat>characters aren't characters, but merely a collection of tropes, character defects, and stereotypes to the point where the most likeable characters are the jew with mother issues, and the asthmatic... with mother issues>Creators care little about the actual source material of science and physics, to the point where physics professors looks at GCSE/A-level physics on their whiteboards in bemusement>Creators know little or nothing about nerd/geek/scientific culture.>Why are geology and engineering 'faux' sciences, but psychology is apparently a well respected hard science?>Why do the cast wear 'Dr' as a big achievement? In the US, that shit isn't respected, unless you're an actual medical doctor>Why do all the cast shy away from being professors?>Why do they all wear the psychological scars of the worst treatment of nerds, even after so long?>Why are all the characters split into two sections, socially awkward scientists and dumbass yet somehow succesful non-scientists, with neither group not participating in any part of any activity associated with the other group?>Why is this show constantly on E4, when Brooklyn 99 vanishes every other month?Close Enough looks decent. BBT as far as I can tell is what must get created when you try to bully a mathlete, and they beat the shit out of you, fuck your girlfriend, and mock you as you start your film studies course.
