>>93712870I have two scales. How much I enjoyed and how good it is. Like with your B-movies I am aware I can enjoy bad things. I think Food Fight is fucking hilarious, but that doesn't make it a good film.
>>93712896No, actually it sounds like I made a robust argument that addressed the 'it's all subjective' line of logic, smashed it and left you with nothing but 'you hate the politics' as a last line of defence.
>>93712856I didn't say you thought it was good purely for its agenda, though that is the source of adoration for many. What I am saying is a LOT of people like SU for the agenda which made a large group and eventually that group hit critical popularity mass. Once you're at certain popularity levels people come to the media not for the content but for social interests.
What I am saying is, while you may like SU I do not believe the content of that media justifies or has generated its following.
