>>93665449>works himself to the bone>soup kitchen volunteerHA! That sure as hell isn't Jerry, but keep projecting.
Also I wouldn't consider corrupt bankers or others who simply fuck over others to gain power as great men. Tell me what else these people have done and maybe I'll change my evaluation.
And again, your reading comprehension has failed you. I evaluated Rick divorced from morality, and have acknowledged that morally, Rick is a shit person. When have I said the ends justified the means?
For that matter, don't blame me for the existence of the criteria I've used. It's not like we don't judge people by their deeds as a society already. Sure, there's a rare few who are elevated primarily on morality, like Mother Theresa, but who is history more apt to remember? The Alexanders, the Napoleons, the Washingtons....people who did great things and tried to change the world through their deeds. Was it right for Alexander to slaughter his way through Europe for his empire? Was it morally right when Napoleon took France as Emperor? Should Washington have led the armies to victory against the British, who had legal sovereignty over the colonies?
What do you say, anon? Who is a better person, the burger flipper or the salesman? The politician or the doctor? The lawyer or the shelf stocker? We judge people on what they do all the time.
