>>93449178modern feminism is still processing its stance on certain issues such as pornography and breasts.
You'd think pornography would be a clear no-brainer for SJW-types to go after but you don't see much comment of it. As degrading as porn tends to be, it is a form of power that females have over males so feminists are careful to touch this issue. It doesn't help them that the porn business tends to be dominated by alpha male types and isn't as easily pushed over as, say, the IT industry's beta males who are doing "coding for girls" programs in 2017 as if this industry has magically held off from the 1960s sexual revolution despite other industries like the legal and medical professions being literally dominated by females within a single generation.
Breasts are similar, they are objects of power that women have over men but the simple fact is that they *are* designed for the male gaze, and anything intended for the male gaze is inherently evil. They're still trying to wrap their head around their philosphical stance here, are breasts evil or is it ok to use an evil artifact to fight the evil patriarchy?
For now, breasts are like a somewhat neutral country in a world war, they've been set aside for now but both sides consider them to questionable at best and will ultimately need to be dealt with as at least quasi-enemies. Feminists like to pretend that large breasts simply don't exist in the real world because it lets them bash male-gaze artwork, if large breasts didn't actually exist it'd be a lot easier for them to bash without hesitation.
