>>93443176 So Doom. I've been saying that for a while as well.
>>93443191 Dark Reign was one of my favorite Marvel eras, so it might just be because of that.
>Norman's Character Oh yeah, I'm not dissagreeing with any of that. It's just that because he's strictly a Spider-Man villain, he's become very one-note. He does the same shit every single time. During the T-Bolts era and then Dark Reign, he became a more interesting and multifaceted character. At least IMO.
>>93443197 Yeah, those apply. But I was thinking of this:
>Biological ehancements vs Technological Norman goes with Serums whereas Stark goes with nanofleets and armors.
>Extreme Capitalist vs Balanced Capitalist Norman is the guy who doesn't care about what happens to the little man, as long as he gets what he wants, whereas Tony still tries to do some things "better" (eg green cars and energy).
>"Family"-Man vs Bachelor Norman is the classic family man with a legacy, whereas Tony is still a bachelor playboy.
And for the similarity:
>Self-Made Man vs Self-Mad Man Norman created OsCorp due to his father being an abusive ass who lost everything. Tony build Stark industries from a small munitions firm into a multinational, driven by his dad's abuse.
Sure, you can find parallels between almost any character, but considering Spider-Man's huge rogue's gallery, and Stark's "just guys with armor" one, I think it'd be fun to exchange enemies for a while.
