>>91633668>She's not the ONLY way to write a female character well, so whatever unrelated example you're trying to invalidate is most likely just as valid.
He didn't say that but since you're trying so hard to shit up this thread I'll go there. Being the opposite of heroic, and ideal to strive towards, someone who does things for others and on top of that is't a nasty, hateful bitch isn't just as valid. It's a shitty person and seen as being inferior to OP's example for a reason>If we were talking about male characters, would you be this picky about what traits they're "allowed" to have without being a heavy-handed political agenda?
But we're not and that makes you unreasonably butthurt. And it doesn't take a political agenda in order to not like shitty people/characters >If you're trying to tell feminists how to femin, try not to use standards even more extreme and unreasonable than the ones you want to discredit.
Not being a vapid, attitude-filled, selfish, whiny piece of shit isn't extreme or unreasonable.>>91634361>Ah, I see. You were strawmanning
He did nothing of the sort. He pointed out where you're wrong>>91634494>Projecting this hard>>91634535
That's not what anyone did. You got butthurt, made a shitpost about it, got called out out on that, then got even more assblasted and shitposted even more thinking that would somehow make you right>>91635982
He's not arguing with logic, He's going by how by how OP's post makes him feel. And it's about as inspiring and any other and SJW or any other retard mouths off about things they clearly know nothing about; which is to say it isn't>>91638017
He wasn't even using logic to begin with