>>90923440So Disney wanted to cash in on a name and then didn't.
That is really not so big a thing. You can't keep people from making movies about lions and the product they turned out was bigger than anything before.
I mean, it's probably more Hamlet in there than Kimba, too.
Getting your idea from something is not plagiarism. Not by a long shot.
And it's really hard to try and call property on a character in terms of personality concept, not likeness.
The lawsuits over action movies would never end.
Maybe someone actially still remembered the pitch by Goldman in 2012 and used the title remembered from one pitch three years back. That's probably the biggest thing connecting them.
And in big parts of the world the movie isn't even called that.
Other than that? I guess you can't really patent hot latinas, can you?
If there is a script you can just check for copied and paraphrased sections. If you have two movies, parallels are easy to show. Proving they worked from your pitch years later? Maybe if they had done the movie three years earlier so they would have to go into production with his pitch. Why would they wait for another guy to have pitches and then warp his idea into yours, or something similar?
