>>90357405>Two characters have separate motivations. Shocker.You don't do things in movies unless it serves a purpose. Lois' arc served no purpose. Perhaps they wouldn't have to resort to a 3 hour cut if they cut out unnecessary fat.
>Her entire purpose is to set up the idea that there are other metahumans that have a presence in the world. Besides, I thought you fucks whined about "rushing" and there not being enough movies establishing things?
People wanted separate movies to do that instead. Not one movie doing the job of 20. Same as the Lois Lane stuff, unnecessary fat that could have easily been written off and handled later. It was a cynical and creatively bankrupt tactic in setting up your universe.
>The entire movie is about people not trusting Superman and Superman understanding why he wants to be a hero. Did you just not watch the movie? What? I thought that was MOS purpose. So he's just relearning the same shit? Ok. What's the need for the internal conflict? It played no part in the film. Superman was still doing all the heroics in response while looking begrudging about it.
>Batman literally says that he doesn't trust somebody with that much power. He sees him as a monster until he sees him fear for his mom. I'm now convinced you didn't watch the movie?Batman knew about other meta humans but makes no attempt to question them? Why isn't he the least bit suspicious about Luthor having access to the Kryptonite?
>The movie says multiple times that Batman has been active for years and foreshadows other events that have happened in the universe. That still doesn't explain why he doesn't approach things more rationally. If he doesn't trust anyone, why isn't he suspecting Lex? Plot convenience. The movie doesn't do a good job of explaining his changed demeanor. If he's more violent, why doesn't he go after the Joker?
You're just a blind DCuck that now you've resorted to just saying I haven't seen the film.
