>>89267637>You don't remember the first Chip Skylark episode and want to talk about canon?I wasn't that other anon, calm your tits.
I admit I didn't remember that far back since, well, that was 15+ years ago, and to that, you can chalk that up to being a "show". It's not going to be obvious it's not just "stage prop-ery" that could have justified a floating green hair manlet without it being a exposed magical fairy.
>Or the time when Cosmo and Wanda had a house above the Turners and it was fine because they didn't say they were fairies.That entire episode with the Godparents as adult friends to the Turners had the Fairies go out of their way to explain why x was this to the Turners so they wouldn't expect anything out of it, but regardless, they are retards, so that's barely anything relevant.
>Also, there was the time in Pipe Down where Crocker saw Cosmo and Wanda and nothing happened, because he couldn't say anything.Again, like above, it was explained "visually" throughout the show itself, Crocker saw the fairies, no one can hear him, they don't notice the fairies. And to that, Jorgan doesn't do anything because he was never alerted that Timmy's fairies were discovered, because no one could hear Crocker to notice the fairies.
Hell, I can even call one other moment where Cosmo, exposing himself, on TV when Vicky was channel surfing; that episode Timmy wished to be in a video game and the fairies had to keep Vicky from overusing the power before Timmy could get out of the game.
Stop nickpicking. The point isn't the fairies being exposed is the trigger itself, it's how blatant they come across as magical fairies to people, like pic related, when Cosmo reveals himself as a fairy to a crowd of people, when Crocker himself owned Cosmo and Wanda as fairies 30 years before Timmy did. People pointing out the Fairies just flying around out of character when they actively avoided being seen prior to the latest episodes is justified.
