>>88924282The entire issue is cool. Other than the SM/WW story, which was handled in a very respectful manner for both characters - although i don't like much the idea that WW would be mostly attracted by Superman's godlike abilities - there are various other stories that are interesting.
I love both SM and WW very much as characters and in theory they should make a good couple, since they're great characters, but unfortunately other than their obvious similarities not a single writer, in my opinion, have yet managed to create a good chemistry between them.
The biggest problem is that they use Wonder Woman mostly to create conflict between either Superman and Clark Kent or Superman/Clark Kent and Lois Lane.
What can you explore with Wonder Woman, as a romantic interest for Superman, that you can't with Lois Lane? In DC's opinion is the fact that she's a princess that lived almost her entire life secluded in a paradise filled immoral and super-powered female warriors, and thus is a bit vain, ruthless and completely disconnected from humanity's struggles and the world's affairs.
So she's mostly used to represent the possible or either outright death of Superman's humanity. She doesn't call Superman by Kal for nothing, instead of the commonly Clark or Kent. So she's used to remind Superman that he is... Superman and can maybe achieve much more by fully embracing that than separating his time being a super-hero and being just Clark Kent. That's the inner-struggle that she brings to Superman stories. That and his struggle to remain faithful to Lois Lane, like in some stories during the late 90's and early 2000's.
And man, that simple isn't a good take for a couple in case you want to root for them to be together. It makes both Superman and Wonder Woman look bad. It's basically a cautionary tale.
Well... thank you for the compliments. Kinda blushing here. You too seem cool. Liked talking to you. 
