>>88634642That's not what objectification means, Anon. Objectification is when a person is reduced to an object, as the name suggests, and it comes in lots of different forms. Slavery is the archetypal objectification. A villain's henchmen being portrayed as only objects for the hero to overcome is objectification. The male leads of trashy romantic novels being nothing but a collection of ideal romantic traits is objectification. Objectification in fiction is generally when a character is depicted as a prize, goal, obstacle or otherwise as less than a person.
Sexual objectification, which you're probably thinking of, is only one form of objectification. But it's the "objectification" that makes it what it is, not the "sexual". If a character is depicted as sexually attractive, but otherwise treated like a person with complex traits and depth beyond that, then it's not sexual objectification. And the martian queen was given as much personality and motive as anyone on that show.
So no.
