>>84856933but they're all saying she's controllable, like this asshole who keeps saying she's going to be arrested
you're talking about the alternative to an uncontrollable candidate being one who is subject to the checks and balances of good governance, as though that's a viable argument
the truth is, even if she's going to be arrested and charged, even if she ends up being president and impeached - you need someone like her over someone like Trump, because Trump will turn on you when it suits him to do so, which will be soon after he realizes he's got his feet under the table
if Hillary ends up in jail, you get her boring VP for probably a couple of years like Gerald Ford had and then maybe four more if the guy's any good
it's not exciting and it's not a black eye for anybody, but don't be fooled: it's the saner option even if you think she's a criminal
>>84857785>Because they knew what was going to happen, but crime has actually fallen since the early 1990s, contrary to the then-hip predictions of John J. DiIulio, Jr., so you're wrong
enjoy eating shit in a TRUMP-branded death camp, dumbass