>>83042720You don't even have to be a scientist, This is basic highschool shit. They teach you the difference between scientific theories and every-day-joe theories in bio (at least when I went to school, they did)
>>83042731Not all theropods had feathers. Anyone stating that has no right to be in science. We know for a fact some dinosaurs like Carnotaurus had scaly skin thanks to skin impressions (what little we know of Carnotaurus is all because of just one specimen, too...) Allosaurus is also unlikely to have feathers. Some scientists say that there's the /possibility/ that any dinosaur could be feathered, if you believe feathers were ancestral to the dinosaur group, but that doesn't guarantee them feathers
>>83042739Yes
>>83042849Feathered dinos is more topical
>>83043414T. Rex's arms are the same length as ours. You could arm-wrestle a T. Rex, albeit awkwardly granted the T. Rex didn't maim you or was even still alive
Also, just to put this out there: I'm not the anon freaking out about no feathers
