>>82799689>could easily be interpreted as posting content that breaks the law, on a website where child pornography is often posted to get threads delted.Not really. People who acknoledge context actually know that "illegal" actually refer to the rules of the 4chan board.
> Within this context, you should have instead made the statement "Some people are so cripplingly autistic, they spam threads with rule breaking content to get it deleted instead of just ignoring it."1. I didn't made that original post and I find ludicrous some would belive Enter would actually do those kind of stuff.
2. No, "illegal" is an apt word to use to describe something that break the rules of the board.
>Is that clear enough?It didn't help that the opinon you tried to express was wrong, but now it's clear, thanks.
