>>82103786I'll do it for you, my friend.
>we like to know who we are and what our purpose isSince the age of moderns, they've tried (unsuccessfully IMO) to tear down the concept of the Final Cause. Aristotle proposed that the Final Cause (telos) of humans is happiness, that is, self-fulfillment. He just assumes it's a wrong conclusion without offering justification.
>that nothing else around us is an intelligent form of lifeBy intelligent, we mean capable of reason. Again, an Aristotilean definition of man is "rational animal." He tries to go against this by saying other life forms are "intelligent" despite the fact that only humans have displayed the ability to reason.
>we approach reality by the limits of our perception Again, false. Since the very beginning people have attempted to go beyond the senses and get to knowledge of the immaterial. Even though some people have failed to do it properly, at lest they've tried.
>we see three percent and assume it's enough to build a worldview out ofThis only applies to hardcore empiricists (only my senses matter) and atomists (only the material world is real).
I don't know how long this is going and I'm not sure anyone will read it, so I'll just leave it at that for now.
