>>81640412Also /co/ this is a hard concept for me to pin down, maybe because it seems like only I see it, but it seems like we write these "greater than human characters" Gods, advanced AI, etc that supposedly are above humanity and come to better or greater conclusions than your average human. HOWEVER those conclusions are still, very human in nature. Because the people writing them are human and we humans can't think outside of our own human brains, it's impossible, we think we do but really don't because it's just a physical limit on what our own minds can perceive.
A good example would be like "you can't kill this guy because it's integral for the time line!" why would the time line care about one piece of biological meat? Hell, "care" implies conscious decision making. That's projecting consciousness onto something else that probably doesn't even have it. That's still a human putting humans at the center of the universe, like it's purely created for us.
It's like part of human arrogance to assume one's own thoughts go beyond being a human.
