>>81591995>stuck in his world's powerlevelThat's not my argument. Jesus christ.
The point is that the statement:
>he can beat any characters so far presented in his universeDoes not imply
>he can beat anything everEven if he -can- beat anything ever you don't arrive at that conclusion through that logical leap, but through other means.
Beyond that, as much as people like to talk about him being unbeatable, overwhelming or absolute power is actually relative, specially when it's not given a specific limit (omnipotence being one).
>contextHis gimmick is being overwhelmingly physically capable to the point where every other character in his universe is weak. But adding up random stuff like say, saying he'd be immune to time travelers or reality warpers really is pushing unless you can provide anything to back it up.
>the original argument is invalidHow is it invalid to say that the following is false
"X applies to sub-set A therefore X applies to all possible sets"
That statement is a logical fallacy, one that I pointed out, even if it's still not clear.
>disliking the characterI actually like the character, but I don't understand why people extrapolate his powers to mean so much more than what's presented.
I see people pulling off the universe/galaxy buster punch when if you look at ONE's interviews he never said so.
For all we know he could have no punch power limit or he could have one, just one that's above everything -in his universe-.
>inb4 but if we take off his universe he suddenly becomes more powerful right? 
