>>81395294Finnick/nick was sunk hard by devs, there's a tweet saying it's just a business partnership, no real backstory or friendship to it. (source: rich's twitter go see it if you're in doubt)
>>81395156>>81395198>>81395273>again with this shitTL;DR wall o text:
Yes they are just friends by the end of the first film, this is 100% canon confirmed by Rich and Byron and no one can argue it. HOWEVER
it's basically confirmed that they WILL be more than friends following the events of the film (aka: sequel)
>it's not confirmedYou're right, not one dev has flat out stated "yes they will be getting together", so yes, you get your ammo for that, however it doesn't matter that it hasn't been plainly stated (this is not (generally) allowed for movie devs to do as a rule and speculation = more fan $$$ overall for the devs due to invested interested in Judy and Nick's future relationship)
because unfortunately for you friend zoned individuals, there's already been more than enough teasing (source: rich's twitter / crave interview / facebook interview ) to basically say "yes it's going to happen, we just can't flat out say it."
These aren't even subtle hints, just go read them yourself
>facebook interview confirms nothingCorrect, it confirms that they "can't say anything on it" aka it's purposely left open, then you add in all the other evidence and hints from the other soruces (seriously, watch the crave interview. 2 minutes 13 seconds in. It's on youtube.) and the result is obvious.
The vast majority want it and the vast majority have the $$$
Imagine the negativity around it if it didn't happen. Normies want it too, it's not just Judy fucking furfags like myself (and you reading this, you know who you are, degenerate)
It's happening baby, and nothing can stop it. Facts are facts, just gotta learn to read them twitters and realize that they cannot by "law" just flat out say "it's happening" so we have to just know it is without it being flat out said
/tl;dr