>>80267872Yeah. I wasn't saying she was automatically right. She has the right to be offended, and the right to be called on her bullshit. Offended doesn't mean right at all. But she can bitch and moan all she wants.
>>80268011Heh, the ethics of fair representation I guess. Which I think it's idiotic and the wrong argument, but it is an argument about ethics, isn't it? What would be the right thing to do? I can't think of another word.
I'm not agreeing with them, it's just that if you see someone wronging a woman, you don't have to be a woman to talk shit and make things right, which is why the original argument:
>She's not even asian.>Why does she care so much about yellow washing Danny?Is kind of a falacy. An ad hominem falacy, I think. She's still wrong because like
>>80267872 says, opinion and informed opinion are different things.
