>>79785802>He was not in a position of authority over her. He wasn't even her chaperone.It was literally agreed to by Charlotte's permission in same episode. Clearly, her later reaction to his potential exploitation of her daughter makes it impossible that she thought Bojack, a 50-something, was being given permission to date her daughter, a 17 year old.
>And he didn't corrupt Penny.New Mexico law disagrees, but we're not just talking about Penny.
Bojack encouraged three teenagers to drink, to trespass, and to conceal his involvement in their crimes. He supplied alcohol to them. He knowingly deposited an unconscious, intoxicated and incapable minor at a hospital along with another minor, whom Bojack intimidated into concealing Bojack's part in their crimes. This demonstrates a clear understanding not only of his crimes to that point of the evening, but that the penalties for those crimes would be serious and that he was therefore attempting to avoid said penalties. It's as clear a sign of guilt as any jury would need to convict.
>>79795854Under New Mexico law and in this specific context, yes they are.
This was decided by the lawfully elected representatives of the people of New Mexico and is therefore the standard of that community. Whether you agree with it or not doesn't change the facts.
>It's really funny watching faggots move out of California. It rarely goes well for them.Protip: Don't move to New Mexico, you don't know anything about the people there.
>>79791348Most of them make those bad decisions with other minors. The law of New Mexico recognizes and makes allowance for that fact, but seeks to punish predatory older sexual partners - which is why it draws a clear distinction about positions of responsibility and trust.
Since the rest of your argument is based on an imaginary strawman, it isn't worth rebutting your specific points as they don't intersect with the issue here.
