>>79108524Yeah, I think it's just the idea of attacking someone for not wanting to provide something for free. Just seems incredibly rude to me, though within the context that what is being provided has some value.
>>79108599I think it's the case of, just where will they go. It's interesting actually, considering /sug/ comes back for a couple weeks and is banned again. So many people jumped back into those generals and I wonder where they went when it was sent back to trash, because over there the threads go by much much slower.
>>79108885Well luckily there's no main incest pairing in Star vs. That whole mess is always going to cause issues. I can understand where it comes from, given the lack of development of side characters in the show. But the only characters with a similar relationship to those two in Star vs. is just Star and Marco, and that's just the vanilla option.
>>79109083We'd know it was you anyways, fuck it keep it on.
It's hard to say if it'd work with other generals, I'd like to see the mods try it out as SU threads are popping up here and there with a thin veil of a premise that's already been discussed in the prior general
I mean, what hasn't when you have like 5 threads a day hitting 1k posts.We were lucky that so many people were open to discussing the idea of weekend threads, in the blood moon special threads we had long discussions for and against them. In the end it worked out.
>>79109310Eh some people will always have weird ass interpretations of anything, especially shipping. As long as there's a distinction between the actual canon and the created content that's acknowledged then hey, fuck it, let people do what they want.
